Integrations power today's networked enterprise IT ecosystems. As you integrate more apps, systems and cloud services, you need a solution that scales up with your growing needs.
In this article, we compare Jitterbit and MuleSoft two of the best known integration platform as a service (iPaaS) vendors found in the market today. These are two very different types of solutions, but in the right use-cased they can bring you value.
What is Jitterbit
Jitterbit is a versatile iPaaS solution known for its ease of use and speed in deploying cloud-based integrations. It focuses on simplifying the integration process with its intuitive design and rich library of pre-built templates and connectors.
Founded in 2003, Jitterbit has built a reputation for delivering quick and efficient integrations across various SaaS applications and systems. Its Harmony platform provides a low-code environment for creating and managing integrations, catering to both technical and non-technical users.
What is MuleSoft
MuleSoft is a major player in the integration platform as a service (iPaaS) market focused on an API-led integrations. Acquired by Salesforce in 2018, MuleSoft is best known for its Anypoint Platform, which offers broad capabilities for API management and integration.
For ITSM professionals, MuleSoft's value lies in its ability to create a cohesive yet flexible integration network via its Anypoint Platform. Working like an enterprise service bus (ESB), Anypoint allows you to design, deploy, and manage APIs and integrations in a unified manner, supporting both SOA (Service-Oriented Architecture) and microservices environments.
In recent years, MuleSoft has expanded its focus into process automation, offering robotic process automation (RPA) and intelligent document processing (IDP) functionality. These areas bring MuleSoft's service offering closer to broad, intelligent automation platforms like Workato and UiPath.
Jitterbit vs. MuleSoft Integration Platform Comparison
Let’s go through how Jitterbit and MuleSoft compare in five common integration scenarios: API management, data integration, B2B/EDI integration, application integration, and system integration.
API Management
Jitterbit's API Manager allows users to create, publish, and manage API integrations between software systems. The platform supports REST and SOAP APIs and offers tools for designing, deploying, and securing APIs.
MuleSoft's Anypoint Platform is built for API management. It provides an API Designer for creating RAML or OAS specifications, allowing you to define your API contract before implementation. An API Manager lets you set policies and monitor usage, giving you control over your API's behavior and performance. An API Portal offers documentation and interactive testing capabilities. Overall, MuleSoft gives you one of the most comprehensive solutions for managing API integrations.
Jitterbit's API Manager allows users to create, publish, and manage API integrations between software systems. The platform supports REST and SOAP APIs and offers tools for designing, deploying, and securing APIs.
Data Integration
Jitterbit Harmony iPaaS supports the synchronization of data across various systems in real-time or through scheduled batches. The platform supports a wide range of data sources, including databases, cloud services, and on-premises systems. Users can map, transform, and cleanse data to ensure accuracy and consistency.
MuleSoft approaches data integration through its own DataWeave data language, which allows for complex data manipulations. The AnyPoint platform supports batch processing for handling large volumes of data, and works with various data formats including XML, JSON, and CSV. The platform also has a large number of ETL/ELT features to support data integrations.
B2B/EDI Integration
Jitterbit's Harmony EDI solution supports the exchange of electronic documents with trading partners using standardized formats like X12 and EDIFACT. The platform offers pre-configured EDI templates for common documents such as orders, invoices, and shipping notices.
MuleSoft supports B2B integrations through EDI message parsing and generation capabilities. It includes support for the AS2 protocol, commonly used in B2B communications. In addition, AnyPoint includes Partner Manager features to handle external data integrations and different data standards of partners.
Application Integration
Jitterbit enables application integration with its intuitive drag-and-drop interface, enabling users to map and transform data easily. It supports a wide range of data sources and formats, ensuring seamless data integration and synchronization.
MuleSoft supports application integration through Anypoint Connectors for popular SaaS and on-premises applications. For custom applications, it offers a connector SDK. AnyPoint’s Flow Designer provides a visual environment for creating integration flows between different applications.
System integration
Jitterbit Harmony iPaaS connects various applications to streamline business processes. The platform includes pre-built connectors for popular SaaS applications like Salesforce, NetSuite, and Shopify. Harmony includes pre-built connectors, a drag-and-drop interface and automated workflows across different apps.
As MuleSoft is owned by Salesforce, you can guarantee that they have deep ERP and CRM system integration capabilities. MuleSoft supports various system integration patterns, including real-time, batch, and event-driven architectures.
Factors to Consider When Comparing Jitterbit and MuleSoft
Jitterbit and MuleSoft are quite different solutions in both shape and size. Here are some factors to consider:
- Scalability and Performance:
Both MuleSoft and Jitterbit have a track record of efficient deployments. MuleSoft uses a clustered architecture for enterprise-scale deployments, while Jitterbit’s Harmony platform ensures quick and scalable integration processes.
- Monitoring:
MuleSoft provides Anypoint Monitoring with customizable dashboards for oversight, while Jitterbit offers real-time monitoring and alerts through its intuitive interface.
- Security and Compliance:
Both MuleSoft and Jitterbit have extensive security functionality. MuleSoft offers Anypoint VPCs for isolated network environments, while Jitterbit emphasizes secure data handling and compliance with industry standards.
- Community and Ecosystem:
MuleSoft's ecosystem is generally larger and more established, reflecting its longer presence in the enterprise market. Jitterbit’s community is growing, with a focus on user-friendly integration solutions.
Why Choose Jitterbit?
Jitterbit can be an option for you if you prefer a straightforward, low-code platform for quick and efficient integrations. Its user-friendly design and pre-built templates make it ideal for businesses looking for rapid deployment.
Jitterbit Highlights:
- Intuitive drag-and-drop interface.
- Fast deployment with pre-built connectors and templates.
- Strong focus on user experience and simplicity.
Why choose MuleSoft?
MuleSoft may be a good option for you if you’re consolidating your enterprise tech stack around Salesforce. It can handle most cloud-based integration patterns and a broad range of pre-built connectors to and from Salesforce apps.
MuleSoft highlights:
- API creation and integration capabilities.
- Supports automation with a large template library and RPA access.
- Wide capabilities in composite service integration.
ONEiO as an Alternative to Jitterbit and MuleSoft
If you’re not sure if Jitterbit or MuleSoft is the best option for your integration needs, you may consider a third alternative, ONEiO.
.png)
ONEiO gives you a streamlined, no-code integration service that stands out for several reasons:
Effortless integrations as a service
While MuleSoft and Jitterbit have some low- and no-code functionality, ONEiO is the first integration platform that offers end-to-end integrations as a service. This is especially valuable in case you don’t plan to hire a full team of system integrators to maintain your integration ecosystem.
Integration automation beyond pre-built connectors
ONEiO supports a wide range of endpoint types and data formats, including JSON, XML, CSV, and plain text. It provides robust mechanisms for both push (using webhooks and REST/SOAP) and pull (via API, SFTP, SQL) data processing. This flexibility ensures that ONEiO can handle various integration scenarios with ease.
Security and compliance
ONEiO offers strong security features, including encrypted credentials and support for multiple authentication standards (Basic Authentication, Token, API Key, OAuth, etc.). It also allows connections to internal networks and supports reverse proxies or whitelisting. The platform is built on AWS and ensures high availability and GDPR compliance.
Business logic and data orchestration
ONEiO provides a no-code editor for creating business logic, transforming, and translating data. It supports various transformation options like regular expressions, case transformations, and date formatting. The platform’s rule robot automates rule creation based on common use cases, making it easy to adjust or add new rules without disrupting existing integrations.
.png)
When to choose ONEiO?
ONEiO is especially well suited for seamless ITSM integration across internal and externally managed IT services. It offers a turnkey solution for the complex integration needs of both global enterprises and IT service providers.
ONEiO highlights:
- ONEAi artificial intelligence model trained specifically for IT service integration.
- Faster time-to-value. Typical integrations take 2 weeks from idea to production.
- 100% satisfaction guarantee based on proven enterprise-grade integration service.
Bottom Line on Jitterbit vs. MuleSoft
Both MuleSoft and Jitterbit are among the most popular iPaaS solutions on the market today. While they both have ideal use-cases, they may not be suitable for all integration needs of today’s complex enterprise IT services landscape.
Choosing between MuleSoft and Jitterbit depends on your specific integration requirements and strategic priorities, such as API management, data integration, and ease of use.
ONEiO offers a powerful, user-friendly alternative. Its no-code platform, flexible integration capabilities, robust security, comprehensive monitoring, and scalability make it a compelling choice for organizations seeking to simplify their integration processes while maintaining high standards of performance and reliability.
